Flight of the Phoenix

PG-13

12/17/20041h 53m

Theatrical Release (US)

~ Out of the ashes, hope will rise. ~

Overview:

When an oil rig in the Gobi Desert of Mongolia proves unproductive, an aircraft crew are sent to shut the operation down and fly them out. On the flight out over the desert on the way to Beijing, Capt. Frank Towns and co-pilot A.J. are unable to keep their cargo plane, a C-119 Flying Boxcar, in the air when a violent sandstorm strikes. Crash-landing in a remote uncharted part of the desert, the two pilots and their passengers -- a crew of oil workers and a drifter -- must work together to survive by rebuilding the aircraft. Soon, low supplies and a band of merciless smugglers add even greater urgency to their task.

Director:

John Moore

Status:

Released

Language:

English

Buget:

$45,000,000.00

Revenue:

$21,009,180.00

Key words:

robbery
based on novel or book
sandstorm
affectation
pilot
gobi desert
mongolia
survival
disaster
airplane crash
struggle for survival
desert
based on movie
oil rig
desert storm
inspirational
smugglers
cargo plane
crash survivor
absurd
admiring
adoring
appreciative
awestruck
baffled

Cast

Dennis Quaid

~ as ~

Frank Towns

Tyrese Gibson

~ as ~

Giovanni Ribisi

~ as ~

Elliott

Miranda Otto

~ as ~

Kelly

Tony Curran

~ as ~

Rodney

Sticky Fingaz

~ as ~

Jeremy

Jacob Vargas

~ as ~

Sammi

Hugh Laurie

~ as ~

Ian

Scott Michael Campbell

~ as ~

Liddle

Kevork Malikyan

~ as ~

Rady

View full cast & crew

Reviews (3)

drystyx
Written 2 year(s) ago
2
This could be one of those "so bad it's good" movies some day. It's a remake of the classic film about men in a hopeless situation when their small plane crashes in the desert. Hope comes back when one of the men reveals he can make an airplane, and the others believe him. In such a story, the subplots and side stories make the story. Here, the subplots and side stories are cartoonish and contrived. The characters are totally without motivation. One can almost see the actors wince about being part of such a horribly written story. In fact, one almost wonders if it was written for the purpose of some day being a "so bad it's good" story. I'm not sure. There really isn't any charm to this movie, no inspiration, no motivation, and that might be too bad to even make the "so bad it's good" list.
CinemaSerf
Written 1 year(s) ago
5
I think to be fair to this reimagining of the story, it tries to be different from the 1965 version. They shift the location and update the dialogue and up to a point that gives it a fighting chance. A plane gets caught up in a sandstorm over the Gobi desert and crashes. It falls to the survivors to work out a plan before the water runs out. Sadly, though, aside from the efforts from Giovanni Ribisi as designer "Elliott" (and that's because at times he resembles Hardy Kruger) the acting is pretty woeful. Dennis Quaid ought to be commended for taking on the Jimmy Stewart role - that was never going to be easy, but he just hasn't the screen presence. The rest of the ensemble form an unremarkable bunch and John Moore's direction does little to deliver any sense of peril or desperation as their predicament gets worse and their personal relationships become more and more fraught. It looks ok, but in the end comes across as little better than an OK television movie that I questioned the necessity for.
N
Narate
Written 6 month(s) ago
4
"The design is perfect, the only flaw is that we have to rely on you to fly it."

I grew up always seeing the poster but never watching this. Now that I have seen it, I can see why. It is a little boring and just not that interesting. Something tells me the original must be the one that has all the flavor.