The Sea of Grass

Watch: The Sea of Grass

4/25/19472h 3m

Theatrical Release (US)

~ Big as its stars! ~

Overview:

On America's frontier, a St. Louis woman marries a New Mexico cattleman who is seen as a tyrant by the locals.

Director:

Elia Kazan

Status:

Released

Language:

English

Buget:

$2,349,000.00

Revenue:

$4,689,000.00

Key words:

husband wife relationship
cattle ranch
environmental conservation
cattle baron
abandoned by mother
grass valley
unhappy marriage
unfaithful wife
out of wedlock child
father son relationship
settlers

Cast

Spencer Tracy

~ as ~

Col. James B. Brewton

Katharine Hepburn

~ as ~

Lutie Cameron Brewton

Robert Walker

~ as ~

Brock Brewton

Melvyn Douglas

~ as ~

Brice Chamberlain

Phyllis Thaxter

~ as ~

Sara Beth Brewton

Edgar Buchanan

~ as ~

Jeff

Harry Carey

~ as ~

Doc J. Reid

Ruth Nelson

~ as ~

Selina Hall

William Phillips

~ as ~

Banty

Robert Armstrong

~ as ~

Floyd McCurtin

View full cast & crew

Reviews (1)

John Chard
Written 6 year(s) ago
5
Why do women insist on loving men for what they want them to be instead of what they are?

The Sea of Grass is directed by Elia Kazan and written by Conrad Richter, Marguerite Roberts and Vincent Lawrence. It stars Spencer Tracy, Katharine Hepburn, Robert Walker, Melvyn Douglas, Phyllis Thaxter, Edgar Buchanan and Harry Carey. Music is by Herbert Stothart and cinematography by Harry Stradling.

We are on the America's frontier and St. Louis woman Lutie Cameron (Hepburn) marries New Mexico cattleman Col. James B. 'Jim' Brewton (Tracy). Brewton is seen as a tyrant by the locals and Lutie quickly comes to realise that nothing will stop her husband from driving his plans forward.

For serious Western fans it straight off looks odd seeing the pairing of Tracy and Hepburn in this setting of farmer/rancher feuding, and the pic never quite breaks away from the initial reaction of things being off kilter. In spite of the undoubted quality of the lead actors, this just becomes a raging soap opera. It's never once convincing, the studio bound theatrics becoming an eyesore, and as the run time inexplicably crawls drearily to two hours in length, there's not even any action to perk up proceedings.

This was a rare blip in the filmic career of Kazan, who gives us all a warning when we find that he disowned the film, even saying he was ashamed of it. That's pretty damning evidence that serves notice on why this should be avoided by anyone other than Kazan, Hepburn and Tracy completists. One tends to think that the plot trajectory of Lutie embarrassed him, for without doubt it's offensive to womanhood, the finale only confirming this in a whirl of smugness not becoming the stars and director. It's a nicely enough produced production, with Stradling's smooth photography sparkling due to HD screenings via TCM, but as the script struggles to enact vibrancy, so shall you struggle to stay awake. 4/10